Clustering under Local Stability: Bridging the Gap between Worst-Case and Beyond Worst-Case Analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
Recently, there has been substantial interest in clustering research that takes a beyond worst-case approach to the analysis of algorithms. The typical idea is to design a clustering algorithm that outputs a near-optimal solution, provided the data satisfy a natural stability notion. For example, Bilu and Linial (2010) and Awasthi et al. (2012) presented algorithms that output near-optimal solutions, assuming the optimal solution is preserved under small perturbations to the input distances. A drawback to this approach is that the algorithms are often explicitly built according to the stability assumption and give no guarantees in the worst case; indeed, several recent algorithms output arbitrarily bad solutions even when just a small section of the data does not satisfy the given stability notion. In this work, we address this concern in two ways. First, we provide algorithms that inherit the worst-case guarantees of clustering approximation algorithms, while simultaneously guaranteeing nearoptimal solutions when the data is stable. Our algorithms are natural modifications to existing state-ofthe-art approximation algorithms. Second, we initiate the study of local stability, which is a property of a single optimal cluster rather than an entire optimal solution. We show our algorithms output all optimal clusters which satisfy stability locally. Specifically, we achieve strong positive results in our local framework under recent stability notions including metric perturbation resilience (Angelidakis et al. 2017) and robust perturbation resilience (Balcan and Liang 2012) for the k-median, k-means, and symmetric/asymmetric k-center objectives. ∗Authors’ addresses: [email protected], [email protected]. This work was supported in part by grants nsfccf 1535967, NSF CCF-1422910, NSF IIS-1618714, a Sloan Fellowship, a Microsoft Research Fellowship, and a National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) fellowship. ar X iv :1 70 5. 07 15 7v 1 [ cs .D S] 1 9 M ay 2 01 7
منابع مشابه
Dagstuhl Seminar 14372 Analysis of Algorithms Beyond the Worst Case
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 14372 “Analysis of Algorithms Beyond the Worst Case”. The theory of algorithms has traditionally focused on worst-case analysis. This focus has led to both a deep theory and many beautiful and useful algorithms. However, there are a number of important problems and algorithms for which worst-case analysis does not provide us...
متن کاملBridging the gap between linear and nonlinear worst-case analysis: an application case to the atmospheric phase of the VEGA launcher
This article presents the application of the structured singular value worst-case approach to the VEGA launcher during the atmospheric ascent phase. The analysis uses a linear fractional transformation model, formed from a subset of the uncertainty and dispersion parameters defined for the nonlinear VEGA system, to identify physically feasible worst-cases. This analysis is complementary to trad...
متن کاملSmoothed Analysis: Analysis of Algorithms Beyond Worst Case
Many algorithms perform very well in practice, but have a poor worst-case performance. The reason for this discrepancy is that worst-case analysis is often a way too pessimistic measure for the performance of an algorithm. In order to provide a more realistic performance measure that can explain the practical performance of algorithms, smoothed analysis has been introduced. It is a hybrid of th...
متن کاملSymmetric and Asymmetric $k$-center Clustering under Stability
The k-center problem is a canonical and long-studied facility location and clustering problem with many applications in both its symmetric and asymmetric forms. Both versions of the problem have tight approximation factors on worst case instances: a 2-approximation for symmetric k-center and an O(log∗(k))-approximation for the asymmetric version. Therefore to improve on these ratios, one must g...
متن کاملMinimal Forecast Horizons and a New Planning Procedure for the General Dynamic Lot Sizing Model: Nervousness Revisited
We show for the general dynamic lot sizing model how minimal forecast horizons may be detected by a slight adaptation of an earlier 0(n log n) or 0(n) forward solution method for the model. A detailed numerical study indicates that minimal forecast horizons tend to be small, that is, include a small number of orders. We describe a new planning approach to ensure stability of the lot sizing deci...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1705.07157 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017